Sunday, October 16, 2011

Is 'Occupy Wall Street' the Left's Tea Party?

The Left's new spin on the 'Wall Street' protests around the country is that these rallies are the Left's answer to the Tea Party movement, and attempts to compare and put it on a par with the Tea Party and it's message abound.

Even President Obama, 'the unifier', who does not endorse the people's voice of the Tea Party - and indeed mocks it - took time recently to endorse the Wall Street protests as the voice of the people speaking their frustrations. In his past diminishing of 'people waving tea bags' to express their voice, he recently took the time to endorse and enable people turning streets into toilets to express their voice.


Some differences between Tea Party and Wall Street Rallies?

~ The President did not endorse the Tea Party
~ The President of the United States and the Democrat Party attack the Tea Party.
~ The Republican party adjusts it's thinking to accommodate the Tea Party.
~ Tea Party members are included in Presidential debates
~ Tea Party rallies include rental toilets so as to not abuse facilities of local merchants.
~ Tea Party rally members defecate and urinate in toilets, not on police cars or the ground.
~ Tea party rally members wear clothes.
~ Tea Party members are crystal clear and unified on the core beliefs.
~ Tea Party members do not require that others work harder in order that they may live for free.
~ Tea Party rally members sleep in their own beds afterwards and not in a tent on someone else's property.
~ Tea Party rallies have a permit, obey local laws, and do no require forcible ejection by authorities.
~ Tea Party members actually recognize that their transportation to their rally was built by a large profit making car company (or Boeing), and that the media outlets that make their causes known are also corporate giants.



... just to name a few differences!